How arsenic has integrated itself into DNA

DNA, the founding thing of all living organisms, is a fascinating and complex molecule. Since the discovery of its structure by Watson and Crick in 1953, scientists have done their best to understand its ins and outs. How its multiplication and division gives us our children, how slight modifications in its pattern can change everything about its carrier, how its mutations can lead us down the path of evolution and how the damage it incurs can lead to cancer and other diseases.

Its structure is well known: a double strand of long molecules composed of 4 different nucleotides (A, T, C and G) which match up in pairs (A-T and C-G) creating a double helix shape. Each nucleotide is composed of a base (A, T, C or G) and a five-carbon sugar which are linked together by a phosphate group. This creates what is known as a phosphate backbone. The only known alteration to this motif is RNA, a single stranded version of DNA. While it has some differences, the main atoms used in its structure are the same found in all other molecules of living things. These same atoms (oxygen, carbon, nitrogen, hydrogen, sulphur, phosphate) are the basis of all bio-molecules and hardly any others are found in their structure. Until now.

A group of scientists lead by evolutionary geochemist Felisa Wolfe-Simon have found a strain of bacteria that contradicts everything we know about the genetic make-up of living organisms. The bacterium GFAJ-1 lives under very special conditions in the arsenic infested waters of Mono Lake in California. Now there are plenty of bacteria that survive under undeniably harsh conditions, like the archea bacteria who can live within acidic hot springs or the methanotrophic bacteria who are known for feeding of the poisonous gas methane. But what makes GFAJ-1 so special is that it has started to integrate arsenic into its genetic make-up. The findings of this group of scientist show that this bacterium is assimilating arsenic and using it as a phosphate substitute in the structure of their DNA and proteins, ultimately creating an arsenic backbone.

So how is this possible? Arsenic is similar in its structure to phosphorous, found in the form of phosphate (PO43-) in bio-molecules. Arsenic is so toxic because its biological form (AsO43-) can be mistaken for phosphate under physiological conditions and lead to huge disruptions of molecular pathways essential to survival. This is mainly due to the fact that arsenic is very instable. The scientists postulated that if a bacterium was able to overcome this instability, it might be capable of exchanging its phosphate for arsenic in biological pathways. After a series of experiments, it seems that GFAJ-1 was not only able to deal with the harsh arsenic infested environment, but used it to change its genetic make-up and proteins, creating a whole new form of life.

These findings are extremely challenging to biology as we know it today, not only from a biochemistry aspect but also from an evolutionary point of view. Is now seems possible that life forms can arise from different atoms than the ones that favoured our evolution. If different conditions can allow the formation of a new life form, can life be found on planets that do not favour the same elements as on Earth? NASA seems to think so, announcing these results as extremely relevant to the search for extraterrestrial life. Further research still needs to be undertaken, but already our horizons could be broadening.


4 thoughts on “How arsenic has integrated itself into DNA

  1. This research is well-known to be nonsense. Why propagate the error further?

    Posted by Anonymous | March 2, 2011, 6:46 pm
  2. Anonymous,Although some of the research here has been questioned, as most science is and should be, whether it is nonsense or not still remains to be said. Having found both for and against articles on the Nature News pages, I still thought it interesting to talk about findings. My blog is about bringing science to non-scientists, explaining it and keeping an open mind about interesting discoveries. It's meant for entertainment and to create a discussion, not judging which I will leave to the experts in the field. If you wish to start a discussion and share your sources, then I'm all for it. Natasha

    Posted by Natasha Agabalyan | March 2, 2011, 7:50 pm
  3. Cool post.

    Posted by Anonymous | March 2, 2011, 8:24 pm
  4. It would be apt to include a paragraph which at least addressed the concerns with this controversial research.

    Posted by Anonymous | March 3, 2011, 12:11 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

About me

Natacha is a research scientist and a lover of all things science! She love finding out interesting facts about all aspects of life, whether it’s how genetic engineering works or what the difference between crimped and straight hair is. There’s a bit of science behind every mystery and the Science Informant will help find the clues for everyone to enjoy and understand the amazing world of science!

Member Button linking to the Association of British Science Writers (ABSW) - an association of science writers, journalists, broadcasters and science-based communications professionals - many of whom are available for freelance work

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 344 other followers

Twitter Updates

%d bloggers like this: